October
2007
12
summary
At best a Crown circumstantial
case charged that Gatzka retained (prejudiced)
Griffiths and therefore Gatzka must have (by a secondary
layer of circumstantial conclusions) created a false Power of Attorney.
On this basis alone the Judge
ought have dismissed the charges.
Based on the “new evidence” and
the trial evidence wherein Gatzka has other Power of
Attorneys etc the
charges now need to be withdrawn/conviction quashed.